Beachworm
Forum Member
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2017
- Messages
- 502
- Location
- Brisbane Australia
- Car Year
- 2010
- Car Model
- Forester X Luxury, sump guard, bigger AT tyres and 50mm Subieliftoz lift, breather extensions
- Transmission
- Auto
You have responded to my rant very well. Thank you for being so thoughtful. I need to apologise, particularly to Rally, for some of my previous post. I should have been more judicious and I was hoping to edit it before it became public but missed that opportunity.
The SF was a lemon. It had only 130,000K on the clock but I think it had taken a dunking before it got to me.
As I said, at the risk of being repetitive, safety has to be a major concern because it is the only car I have and it wasn't chosen because of its off-road ability. I simply decided to use it off road when I had the time and opportunity to do so.
If I could have 2 cars, I might consider an SF as a project second car and drive a Lexus otherwise. I would put a bigger engine in it or fit a supercharger but I would rather use an auto than a manual. The clutch has always been a weak point in Subarus and that was deliberate to protect the drivetrain.
It seems to me that arguing about what makes off-road ability is a moot point because the factors have been well established by experts better than any of us. Some of those factors are used to determine ADR classification. (ground clearance, approach and departure angles and break over angle) The other factors are traction which is a function of weight on wheels combined with friction between tyre and track, power/torque to weight ratio up to the point where this overcomes friction, Centre of gravity, turning circle/manouverability, etc. Why are we arguing about it?
The SF was a lemon. It had only 130,000K on the clock but I think it had taken a dunking before it got to me.
As I said, at the risk of being repetitive, safety has to be a major concern because it is the only car I have and it wasn't chosen because of its off-road ability. I simply decided to use it off road when I had the time and opportunity to do so.
If I could have 2 cars, I might consider an SF as a project second car and drive a Lexus otherwise. I would put a bigger engine in it or fit a supercharger but I would rather use an auto than a manual. The clutch has always been a weak point in Subarus and that was deliberate to protect the drivetrain.
It seems to me that arguing about what makes off-road ability is a moot point because the factors have been well established by experts better than any of us. Some of those factors are used to determine ADR classification. (ground clearance, approach and departure angles and break over angle) The other factors are traction which is a function of weight on wheels combined with friction between tyre and track, power/torque to weight ratio up to the point where this overcomes friction, Centre of gravity, turning circle/manouverability, etc. Why are we arguing about it?