KYB shocks are valved at 20% harder than the OEM shocks, i know this because i spoke to the KYB bloke when i originally changed them, and it is to allow for suspension wear. If you are going to change your springs and do a lot of offroad stuff it might be worthwhile to consider the OEM shocks. They []might not last as long but could give you a better ride over the rough stuff[/b].
There are also differences between the different springs, as I understand it. I remember reading in a thread somewhere here that Kings and Dobinsons have different ride characteristics, and Silver says something a bit similar in his first post.
So, thinking about it, I don't care much about off-road ride - anything nasty I'm going slow anyway, and I don't care much about ride on the black stuff (how bad can that be?) ....
it's ride on bad roads that matters most. Corrugations, potholes, unexpected rocks. I'm talking long distances at (typically) 80-100k over the typical ruts and corrugations you get on outback roads like (e.g) the Birdsville Track (which was pretty bad last tike I was up that way). And next year, with any luck, the Gibb River Road.
I'm not thinking about my own comfort here (though that's nice too) or even about the safety of the various expensive and delicate things I cart around all day (cameras, lenses, and computers - none of these like vibrations much) , I'm thinking about the reliability and longevity of the poor little Forester.
It's 10 years old and yes, it's built like a Subaru, but everything has its limits, and the more vibration and stress I put on things, the more likely they are to break.
So, am I right in thinking that stiffer suspension really doesn't matter much for tricky off-road work?
Am I also right in thinking that a softer ride on (bad) roads is a good thing?
Given that I want a 25-30mm lift and carry weight in the rear, what does this mean for spring choice and strut choice?
(Sorry for being a pain!