Which is better - NA dual range Foz or L Series?

[Ratbag]

Sorry you're not feeling well...hope you come good soon RB.

Thanks.

This is the point, that your LR suits the sort of offroading you want to do but its not for everyone. Others might want to tackle steeper, rockier hills where a 1.19:1 LR just wont cut it, even with a EJ25 or even a H6! Just ask Venom.

The whole point is that we all have different requirements...for some a 1.19:1 DR Foz is fine, for others 1.447:1 DR Foz is a minimum, & others the 1.59:1 DR L-series is the bees knees.

I think you are completely missing my point.

My problem is not whether this LR ratio suits anyone else.
My objection is to being told by others that it cannot and should not suit me ...
I do not presume to instruct others as to what may or may not suit them.
I object to them deciding that they need to instruct me on the topic. I also wish them luck :iconwink: .

I also object to the necessary implications embedded in statements such as "Others might want to tackle steeper, rockier hills where a 1.19:1 LR just wont cut it, even with a EJ25 or even a H6!".

I re-iterate, I still haven't found any situation where the LR ratio is in any way the limiting factor ...

 

[mr turbo]

And what's IMNSHO?? I'm tired of trying to work out all these new super long abbreviations

In My Not So Humble Opinion
There you go mate.

What I do not get is why those people feel free to castigate others about what suits said others.

We should be able to have a discussion, which takes into account a lot of different points of view without resorting to continuous arguments and so on.

Ditto. I totally agree.

Sorry to hear that you're not feeling the best Ratbag.
Hope you are feeling better soon mate

Regards
Mr Turbo

 

[Biesel]

i thought this thread had finally died.

 

[El_Freddo]

I'm sorry to hear about your health Ratbag, I hope it's on the up.

I really do not care one hair on a bullock's bum if the LR ratio in the SG Foresters suits someone else or not.
I do not care if some other person can gain some real or possibly imaginary advantage by having some other LR ratio fitted. I'm not stopping them ...

My problem is not whether this LR ratio suits anyone else.
My objection is to being told by others that it cannot and should not suit me ...
I do not presume to instruct others as to what may or may not suit them.
I object to them deciding that they need to instruct me on the topic. I also wish them luck :iconwink:

Both of these above statements is what I'm on about without trying to drag the topic completely off side. This thread is about the OP - in this thread, NuZo, and his question about the NA L series and NA foz - both dual range. Simple. It is not your thread to ramble on!

Is it just me that can see this?

What I do not get is why those people feel free to castigate others about what suits said others.

I don't feel that I've castigate anyone in my posts. I'm sick of misinformation and the potential to "lead a fellow forum member up the garden path".

I'll leave off here and drop this thread.

All the best with your health again Ratbag.

Regards

Bennie