Gidday Taza
Sounds like good thinking to me, mate ...
[EDIT]
The 2.5L N/A has about 27% more torque at much lower revs (and with a much flatter torque curve from around 1800 to 6000 rpm), in a body that's about 6.5% heavier than yours. Also significantly higher power, but that's largely irrelevant for real world motoring ...
Don't forget that your gearing is all very different from the SG Foresters too.
Your first and second are just a tad lower than the SG; third and fourth are identical; fifth is much lower in your car than in the SGs, as is the FD ratio. LR is much lower in your car also.
Your stock tyre size is as near as damnit in rolling circumference to the 215/60x16 on the SG.
All this translates into being more careful of your accelerator foot when in LR first and second with the 2.5L, otherwise you might break something ...
I reckon that I would break something serious in mine if I were to pop the clutch at (say) 4000 rpm on a hard/resistant surface in LR first. This will go double for you with your lower gearing.
I don't know, but I am guessing that your CV joints and shafts are probably bigger, heavier and stronger than those in my SG. I know that the ones in my '93 Impreza were! All to keep the weight down in the later models.
[end edit]