And if they were really smart they would have a) parked the car and walked in or b) supported the local sandwich bar for a healthy alternative.
I knew someone was going to mention that...The purpose of a drivethru isnt to park the car & walk in...its to drive through! lol. It should be designed, built & maintained in a way that makes it
EASY & SAFE to do so. Which this one wasnt. A lot of drivethrus are narrow...this one is absurdly narrow with a ridiculous approach!
This is simple passing of the blame. If this drive through is build with similar features of other drive throughs you would think that people would learn to be careful when using them.
Thats the point Bennie, its not!. You have to make a sharp right angle turn in less than one car length. In some cars it would not be possible! In hers ('09 Ford G6), probably not. Plus there were large, deep potholes to be avoided.
So it was the passengers that were compensated by Qantas for poor computer design that was actually not their doing - did the plane's manufacturer compensate Qantas for their compensating of others? I highly doubt it - Qantas was trying to repair their reputation that was on the line. Totally different scenario!
I'm not sure if it was Qantas or Boeing who made the compensation...either way it was ultimately Qantas' responsibility as the service provider to ensure all of their suppliers/parts, etc, are properly designed & maintained. It certainly wasnt a PR stunt as they wanted as little PR as possible...no airline does for their mistakes lol.
It is the same as it relates to poor design/manufacture/maintenance.
Unfortunately I highly doubt that anyone other than the driver, or their insurance company will be paying for the damage to their vehicle.
I do expect someone to pay for the damages. Although I wasnt there when it happened I know she is a very safe driver who not only never speeds but in fact drives 5kmh
BELOW the speed limit. She's very cautious & responsible.
As I took the photos, the white car you see in one actually did run over the curb! As one of 2 cars I watched go through...thats 50% (yes I know, only 2 cars) but it demonstrates that this isnt an isolated incident...its common, as proven by the layer of tyre rubber on the curb AND the numerous deep gashes in the concrete.
or perhaps more correctly I am not convinced the kerb caused the damage to the tyre.
Yeah I'm pretty sure it was the curb, there was black tyre marks on the rim which I cleaned off without thinking I should have left them there for the photo. Either that or the potholes, but I think the curb
OK, I understand you all have your opinions & I personally dislike it when people blame others for their mistake. I believe the flood of trivial law suits is disgusting! BUT...all councils/ business owners need to ENSURE their properties are safe, both for person & property.
....
I"m a bit disappointed that Sam is being attacked for her driving when you dont even know her, or the dimensions of the drivethru. Even in our little Subies it would be difficult to go through there without rubbing the front of the car against the shrubs on the far side or tyre on the curb.
Yes I'm protective of her but that has nothing to do with bad design/build/maintenance. BTW, have you noticed how often I've mentioned "design/build/maintenance"...that is whats important here.
If any of you were driving along & hit a deep pothole around a blind corner, bending your steering, factory alloy rim, tyre, etc, you would have every right to seek compensation from the council as they didnt maintain the road in a safe condition. Its their responsibility to do so. & if you didnt, then its your loss & I would suggest you're foolish not to.