Why choose forester in Australia?

scalman

Forum Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2017
Messages
2,565
Location
Lithuania
Car Year
2006
Car Model
2006 3.0R 5EAT Sportshift VDC/VTD LPG
Transmission
5eat Sportshift
I just wonder why people go for forester in australia ? is it money thing or what ? you need a lot stuff to load in your car there no ? why choose forester ?
 
I initially decided on a Subaru Outback when I down-sized from a Range Rover as it was old and also the kids were getting older so I no longer needed a full size 4WD; then 5 years later when the OB was written-off I got the Foz as the SG now had the 2.5L engine and a shorter nose than the OB.
 
How long is a piece of string? Why is a duck? Different answers from different people ...

My wife's SH is a better family car, with much more rear seat room than my SG. It is bigger and higher, with a 4EAT Jatco sports shift tranny.

My SG is smaller and lower with a dual range manual.

Both are excellent utility vehicles (two box design), handle excellently, decent performance and economy, comfortable for very long distance driving. Australia is about the same size as all of Europe.

The SH suits her better. My SG suits me better.
 
I just wonder why people go for forester in australia ?
My guess is mostly for the safety aspects. Good on-road handling, good on dirt roads (we have a lot of dirt roads) compact yet can hold enough for a couple to travel pretty comfortably with.
Far cheaper to own and maintain than a traditional 4wd, much more capable than a traditional 2wd wagon.
 
Ramp over, approach and departure angles are all better on the Forester than on other models. With my 2006 SG, the SubaXtreme front bar makes a further noticeable improvement to approach angle as well.
 
When researching for a new car I came across the Irvine Subaru Dealership website in the USA. The site had photo's of several smashed up Subaru's, including Forester's. I already owned a 2000 Liberty RX 2.5 Sedan and wanted another Subaru, but with more room as the boot was too small on Liberty for us when traveling.

I settled on the 2003 Forester XS and kept it for 13 yrs before swapping it with my daughters for her 2005 Mazda 6 Limited, I traded that in on a 2013 Honda CRV as I didn't like the way Subaru was going with the Forester. My daughter kept it for a further 3-4 yrs, engine and suspension was still original after 224,781 Kms.
 
Meaning australia huge distances thats needs lots fuel in au you need overland car more then off road car at least i see it that way and subaru cars are none of those. Yes sand driving for subaru no prob but then hoe far you can drive with it, how much fuel take with you, how much other stuff to carry. How you recover it... i think same reason wranglers dont fit there for long distances as well. If have just one off roady car in australia why not have it fot long travels reaching remote places car.
 
Excellent size fuel tank, range
Very good cargo space vs car size
Low cost of ownership
Dual use vehicle that excels at sportiness and overlanding
Safety record
Durability
Ease of self maintenance for most things
Overall size
Modablility
Owners groups better align with our values/desires for social interaction/car use
Build quality

There's a start...
 
on top of whats already mentioned for me my Forester is like a Swiss Army knife of cars , or an all-rounder cricketer
It is very capable in many things but not the best at any of them. Sorry guys, but let me explain.
Mine is modified to be fairly capable offroad but it's not going to beat a proper rockcrawler 4wd
Onroad performance wise, my foz is modified to do mid 13s down the 1/4 mile. Pretty good but of course not going to beat an AMG C63 (my other car :) )
It can carry stuff but it's smallish size does show its limitations when I'm packing for a camping trip.
Fuel economy gets me 10.5L/100km 95RON . Again not bad but not as good as some other small suvs
But it is this combination of talents that makes it a great car to own and drive
 
subarus cant beat anything with manual low gear , at least without heavy mods in drivetrain i dont think they wont do much at slow speed at low revs there. momentum momentum thats all they good at , well in close to stock at least. my only and most people here most thing for buying them reason is cheap , reliable, easy to fix, older models at least.
i thought my auto is bad , but when i drove with that other guy on same gen OBK lifted , even rear locker but on 2.5 and 4eat, he did thought that 50/50 lock button for 4eat. and well when front wheel was against some larger ravine not even deep like it looked like nothing and rear wheels where on some soft sand not even deep in it car was just moving nowhere not front not in reverse, it was just helpless and didint looked stuck at all but couldnt move from place. and no stock manual even dual range wouldnt do better as well at least not turbo ones with 2.0 engines.
 
Interestingly, my 1993 Impreza (and 2006 Forester) would easily go places where my 1968 LWB Landcruiser would bog to the axles in nothing flat. Basically, much lower weight, wider tyres and superior technology.

The Landcruiser had far superior towing and rock crawling ability, of course. BUT, you had to stop, get out of the vehicle and engage the free-wheeling front hubs first. These were all but mandatory due to the appalling fuel economy without them. I also had to design [EDIT] and build [end edit] a new intake manifold for new carburettors because the Landcruiser came with a 1930s design carbie ...
 
Last edited:
well then those older ones where simplier , less computers decide for you , and imprezas are more lighter, for me land criuser have low gear thats it, air down tires , low gear its crawling, i think that way if your car spining tires means not enough grip, air down tires or put more agressive tires for better grip to fix that spinning, there is much to play there modify , but if your car cant spin tires on surface that you at then there is nowhere to go from there, maybe less grippy tires then and smaller size so it would be easier for car to spin them.
but sure i saw modified forester that spin tires no prob even most agressive ones
or i just need rebuild/new gearbox here. but its hard to find anyone with 3.0 5eat stock do those tricks or spin tires on harsh surfaces.
just moment later rear axle broke because of that much tension on them. but for sure its cool. lots custom stuff there VTD in center
 
Sorry, but I disagree.

I learned to drive in WWII jeeps, and tractors. Little tractors, and great BIG tractors.

In many ways, technique and skill are more important than anything else.

However, it's also horses for courses. My Landcruiser would tow my 2 tonne horse float over a lot of nasty tracks. My Forester would not tow it at all ...

I do not get my thrills from breaking vehicles.
 
I think you also forget Scalman that traditional 4wds are also modified - and they have a very large aftermarket support base. How big is your credit card limit??

Back in the day when Subaru’s were making a name for themselves over here (80’s), these little 4wd buzz boxes drove more like an economical around town vehicle. People modified them for more off-road ability - and had to DIY in many cases!
On the flip side, those with a traditional 4wd used to do things to make their 4wd handle more like a car on road than a truck. Now days we all modify our 4wds in some way to be more like an off-road vehicle - even the traditional 4wds!

Lift is always the contentious issue - how high is high enough? For example, I lifted my L series 3 inches and increased the tyre diameter by four inches. So I have a total of 5 inches of lift in that vehicle. With other mods it goes really well off-road while maintaining good on road handling. A four inch lift would be fun but is it really necessary? Probably not.

We now have a mid naughties Pajero/Shogun to fit our growing family into. This thing has as much lift with its saggy springs as my L series does. The factory drivetrain is more than enough required for some decent off-roading. Only mods are for off-road comforts such as a fridge and ensuring the vehicle can take knocks that could happen without stranding us (bash plates). Overall a great vehicle base to 4wd with. But of course we added more. Two inch spring lift, great clearance now and it handles on-road SO much better now! We didn’t realise how bad the old springs were. We’ll stay with the current tyre size as it’s ample.

As for fuel economy it’s a bit higher than the Subaru but it can also carry more fuel with an 81L auxiliary fuel tank, bringing total capacity to 171 litres! It’s awesome when travelling interstate!

What am I getting at? Many don’t realise what they already have in their stock 4wds then they go batshite crazy with mods and end up with a crappy vehicle to drive until you’re hitting some comp truck spec tracks, or chewing out good ones to have their “fun”.

Not all 4wdn is about rock crawling, even then, if you’re bouncing over boulders then you probably shouldn’t be in a vehicle in that area to begin with unless in a comp truck competition!

Some nice lift is good. Tyres make a HUGE difference but overall it comes down to the driver.

Solid axles have their advantage but I feel many that have only driven live axles are lazy off-roaders that stick to what mainstream thinking of live axle 4wding tells them to - stick to the ruts. Where the fun in picking a line? Where’s the fun of challenging the vehicle and the driver’s ability?

My L series continues to surprise me when I feel that I’m over the limit of the vehicle’s ability!

Which one do I like most out of the two? Honestly, that’s a tough one. I love my L series as I built it to what it is now and have learnt so much about Subaru’s along the way AND of 4wding techniques. The Pajero is awesome in its own right too - it has some aftermarket support but is still another underrated 4wd (and I like that!). It’s capable, comfortable, can tow and bring the whole family along with it too. Plus it behaves off-road very much like the Subaru due to the all independent suspension - one of the reasons I wanted to move to a Pajero too.

I’m loathe to give up on Ruby Scoo, but with a family that I like taking bush, the Pajero wins on that front. Ruby Scoo is good for two adults and two kids for several days out bush. Three kids got a bit tight but we managed well enough when no3 was quite young.

As for the forester, another reason for their appeal is their ride height in terms of the driver’s sitting position - higher than many sedans and city cars (like the swift for example), and they’re easy to manoeuvre in a car park, which translates well when out bush too. The larger factory tyre size is a significant factor in selecting the forester as an off-roader out of the Subaru line up.

I hope you enjoyed the essay, there are many options out there for off-roading vehicles, I know general road manners and off-road ability are key in our family.

Lastly, many ppl have a particular type of 4wdn that they enjoy most, and thus, set their vehicles up for this type of action. This can mean it won’t be as good as it could be in other settings. Eg: remote long distance desert/sand travel vs high country traversing (still remote in its own right, but not always as long distance as desert travel can be).

Cheers

Bennie
 
for open diff older 4wd cars sure without lockers they wont go far even with lift . as for lift because they just have much much larger market at least here everything is just cheaper in time and like to lift any older or newer 4wd is not that hard, much simplier then subaru , at least to make yourself. and to buy new better shocks for those jeeps at least is just not that expencive , again everything is there and yes i counted kinda how much it would cost me , mostly it would be DIY though.
but i kinda not interested into lockers like 100% ones as its kinda mess up with all handle of car , but there are cars that allready comes with one or both lockers or good imitation of them. lets take older WJ grand with quadra drive , those work just great.
if take so much older 4wd again lockers to find for it it would be just simple and wont cost that much if that way you going. all thos mods for forester to be capable just cost so much more .
i mean why you need any old toyotas when you can have those in australia. and yes you can go full on with suspension mods and such or just do lift first and tires, rest it will flex still good and will have proper lockers
 
and im sorry for being so agains or grungy or whatever ... i just so hate to be dissapointed myself , sometime when i think that since i bought car it was never yet working properly for me. im glad others make good cars from them , well from older models, i duno anyone in there that would take gen outback to those levels.
 
for open diff older 4wd cars sure without lockers they wont go far even with lift
I beg to differ. Ruby Scoo is open rear diff and front helical LSD, which I’m sure is in need of a service (cheap OBX unit).


^ remember this @NachaLuva ? :D

Pre gearbox mods:


Open diffs, regardless of the 4wd in questions can still be quite capable vehicles with an experienced driver behind the wheel ;)

Your outback should be more than fine for what you want to do. Just don’t go getting stuck in the mud on your belly ;)

Cheers

Bennie
 
Back
Top