MiddleAgeSubie
Forum Member
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2013
- Messages
- 990
- Location
- AZ
- Car Year
- 2018 / 2008
- Car Model
- 4Runner / Tribeca
- Transmission
- 5EAT
My Geolander AT-S, stock size (225-60-17), were purchased in the last days of February 2013 and are about to reach 19,000 miles. All in all, I estimate that a few hundred miles have been spend in demanding terrain and several hundred miles on easy, 2wd pax car (when dry) unpaved roads.
The tires start at 12/32nds, supposedly (I never measured them). Now, my tires are down to 7/32" having lost a full 1/32 during a 1,500 mile trip that involved about 250 miles of off-pavement, about 80% of which more demanding than just super-maintained unpaved roads.
All in all, I must say I am rather unimpressed by how the GeoLs are wearing. While I can definitely use 225-65-17s to increase clearance and reduce front bumper headaches, I am not thrilled with the prospect of replacing tires every other year (though now that my spouse has a Tribeca, this should be more like every third).
Pros: totally fine on road, which is, well, quite important. Great grip in dirt and gravel, where most off-pavement time is spent.
So-so: only average on rocky terrain. This is an issue as even the best AWD system is inferior to a Wrangler-level 4L in rocks. But something gotta give; cannot have it all.
Cons: tire wear.
Having said that, my Toyo AT tires on my B9 Tribeca were wearing at roughly the same rate. They did a bit better, but the Tribeca never saw more than glimpses of the demanding terrain that the OB has made its way through.
There is, of course, no competition in stock size. As for 225-65-17, the only "civilized" tire size alternative, Pirelli Scorpion ATR is the only other option. The Pirelli get very mixed reviews and cost considerably more, which rules them out. So, Yokos it will be anyway, but I am curious.
Do all All-Terrain tires wear so quickly when actually used on all sorts of terrain?
The tires start at 12/32nds, supposedly (I never measured them). Now, my tires are down to 7/32" having lost a full 1/32 during a 1,500 mile trip that involved about 250 miles of off-pavement, about 80% of which more demanding than just super-maintained unpaved roads.
All in all, I must say I am rather unimpressed by how the GeoLs are wearing. While I can definitely use 225-65-17s to increase clearance and reduce front bumper headaches, I am not thrilled with the prospect of replacing tires every other year (though now that my spouse has a Tribeca, this should be more like every third).
Pros: totally fine on road, which is, well, quite important. Great grip in dirt and gravel, where most off-pavement time is spent.
So-so: only average on rocky terrain. This is an issue as even the best AWD system is inferior to a Wrangler-level 4L in rocks. But something gotta give; cannot have it all.
Cons: tire wear.
Having said that, my Toyo AT tires on my B9 Tribeca were wearing at roughly the same rate. They did a bit better, but the Tribeca never saw more than glimpses of the demanding terrain that the OB has made its way through.
There is, of course, no competition in stock size. As for 225-65-17, the only "civilized" tire size alternative, Pirelli Scorpion ATR is the only other option. The Pirelli get very mixed reviews and cost considerably more, which rules them out. So, Yokos it will be anyway, but I am curious.
Do all All-Terrain tires wear so quickly when actually used on all sorts of terrain?
Last edited: