Gidday Tempo
Happy New Year to you and yours, mate.
SWMBO's is an MY10/SH auto Fox ("XS" model trim and equipment here - the best of the N/A range).
I wouldn't say that the interior build quality is poor; BUT I would say that there is evidence of the accountants getting at it everywhere
! As a retired CPA, I guess I can be as rude about my (ex-) profession as anyone! One should always listen to accountants and marketing people very closely - they are experts at what they do.
However, and it's a very big
HOWEVER, one should never allow either to run one's business for one ... If either were any good at being business owners, they wouldn't be bean counters or snake oil salesmen!
Compared with my MY06/SG Fox, lots of little niceties have been left out of the SH, IMNSHO. A dollar saved here; ten dollars there; it's all very obvious to someone skilled in cost accounting. In some ways the interior trim of the SH is better designed (rear door pockets and drink carriers, centre arm rest and table, etc); just not as nice, or as well thought out (no centre dash glove box, etc).
Safety-wise, I reckon that the SH wins hands down. Door frame bolts on the rear doors; rear edge bonnet locks to prevent the rear edge of the bonnet ("hood" to you blokes :iconwink:
) from lifting in a frontal collision.
The SH is far bigger and bulkier all round. However, this makes it a better family car, and even very large/tall people can sit in the back seats in comfort without having to have amputations of any bits, as they do in my SG ... :lol: :rotfl:.
I like the styling of my "second generation" SG better than either the previous models, or the SH and SJ. The "first generation" SG is very nice and "clean" looking, but no dual headlights which I very much appreciated on my Austin Kimberley and our Toyota Camry. These were both far superior to those in my 1993 Impreza. Quite a few other little changes for the better in the 2006 and onwards SG range, IMHO.
Now we have the SJ ...
...
I reckon that Subaru have completely lost the plot here.
Bigger even than the SH; fussy styling, reminiscent of a 1966 Mazda ...
No decent engine/tranny combinations. NO WAY would I go back to a gutless 2.0L N/A engine in a car as big and heavy as the SJ. I don't like turbo engines, or auto transmissions. As to the latter, it goes double for CVTs ...
Kind of leaves me out in the cold as far as buying another Subaru Forester goes ...
.